BreakingModern commentary — The as yet unidentified hackers who broke into Sony Entertainment’s incompetently protected servers have provoked a lawsuit filed by former employees angered by the company’s lack of security. Sony’s people are also angered by a cluster of gossipy news stories about the quality of the next James Bond film and Angelina Jolie’s professional relationships. And now there’s an ensuing media ethics debate over whether publishing emails, salary information, movie scripts and other leaked material is in effect aiding and abetting the cyber thieves.
Sony is cancelling the Dec. 25, 2014 release of its movie, The Interview, citing theater chain fears of harm to staffers and patrons due to alleged North Korean Sony hacks and threats. Scroll below to see the official Sony Pictures trailer for The Interview.
What nobody’s talking about seems like the biggest story of all: the possible motivation of the self-styled, Sony-hacking “Guardians of Peace.”
Suspicion immediately fell upon North Korea due to the hackers’ complaints about an upcoming film, The Interview, which stars James Franco and Seth Rogan. “How bitter fate those who seek fun in terror should be doomed to,” one communiqué declared, referring to the movie’s plot, about assassinating North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un.
For what it’s worth, the government of North Korea has officially denied involvement. Seth Rogan believes them. “There’s no way it’s them’ because it seems too savvy of Hollywood politics.” The U.S. believes North Koreans were in fact behind the Sony hack.
Regardless of the identity of the hackers, one question worth exploring is: Did Hollywood cross the line?
Political assassination plots are nothing new for American films. Based on the Frederick Forsyth spy novel, the 1973 thriller, The Day of the Jackal, showcased the scheming of a man who tried to kill French President Charles de Gaulle during the 1960s. But the movie came out after de Gaulle had already died of old age.
The Quentin Tarantino revenge fantasy, Inglorious Basterds, depicts something that plainly didn’t happen, the arson and machine-gun killing of Adolf Hitler in a French movie theater. And anyway, that was Hitler, only the worst guy ever.
“The gory killing of a sitting foreign leader is new territory for a big studio movie,” Jeanine Basinger, professor of film studies at Wesleyan University, told the New York Times.
It’s kind of fascinating that the American press hasn’t been able to put itself in the shoes of North Koreans, enough of whom obviously support their leader to the extent that he continues to enjoy the tacit consent of the governed.
Imagine, if you can, how Americans would respond – even conservative Republicans – if, say, Iran, Russia, or some other political rival of the United States were to produce a motion picture depicting the violent assassination of President Obama. Many Americans would view such a film as something just short of an act of war, even if it was marketed as a comedy as The Interview is.
Here in the United States, threatening the life of the president is a serious felony punishable by up to five years in federal prison. Why wouldn’t we expect other countries to take the threat against their leaders seriously, too?
Americans don’t get that the citizens of other countries are just as patriotic as we are. Just like us, people in other nations don’t like it when we disrespect their leaders.
Not long ago, everyone, including the United States government, understood that treating heads of state disrespectfully exposed everyone’s leaders to the same treatment. Under international law and tradition, heads of state have been considered immune from prosecution. Even when the U.S. deposes an unfriendly leader in a coup d’état, such as when Jean-Claude Duvalier fled Haiti in 1986, they facilitated his comfortable exile into places like the French Riviera.
It was the United States that broke this understanding between nations.
It began in 1989, with George Herbert Walker Bush’s overthrow of Panamanian President Manuel Noriega. The first Bush administration treated Noriega like a common criminal, trumping up dubious drug possession charges (a “110-pound” stash of cocaine found in his compound turned out to be tamales wrapped in banana leaves), kidnapping him to face charges in the United States on barely discernible legal grounds, and then sentencing him to two decades in a federal prison.
More recently, Bush the second boxed in former U.S. client dictator Saddam Hussein, refusing to fly him out of Iraq, signed off on a ridiculous show trial conducted by Saddam’s political enemies and then delivered him from U.S. custody to be unceremoniously hanged to death in 2006 – while cell phone video cameras rolled. Saddam went out looking classy. “Down with the invaders!” he shouted repeatedly before his death.
Then there was the 2011 killing of Colonel Moammar Qaddafi. Again, the United States didn’t leave the Libyan dictator a way out. Instead, NATO fighter jets and an American drone bombed his convoy, causing him to fall into the hands of opposition forces, who killed him.
Given this recent history, it isn’t surprising that Americans don’t see the big deal about a silly comedy movie fantasizing about killing a man they see as a silly neo-Stalinist dictator. But isn’t this just another case of American exceptionalism?
We see the world one way.
No one else agrees with us.
Here’s the official Sony Pictures trailer for The Interview, below.
Video credit: Sony Pictures Entertainment YouTube Channel
Art credit: “Inglourious Basterds poster” found at the following website: http://www.impawards.com/2009/inglourious_basterds_ver9.html. Licensed under Fair use via Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inglourious_Basterds_poster.jpg#mediaviewer/File:Inglourious_Basterds_poster.jpg
Cover art from the 1973 film The Day of the Jackal: “JackFox”. Via Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JackFox.jpg#mediaviewer/File:JackFox.jpg